The shocking moment a billion-dollar coin collapsed
In the fast-moving world of cryptocurrency, extreme volatility is nothing new. Prices rise and fall sharply in minutes, fortunes are made overnight, and billions can be wiped away in the blink of an eye. Yet, even in such a volatile industry, the recent incident involving Cosmos (ATOM) on Binance was extraordinary.
During what has been described as the largest liquidation event in crypto history, ATOM, a cryptocurrency once valued in the tens of billions, dropped to zero on the Binance exchange before bouncing back to trade at around two dollars. For long-time traders and new investors alike, this moment stands as one of the most dramatic reminders of how fragile digital assets can be when traded in unregulated markets.
The myth of “a coin never going to zero”
For years, many retail traders comforted themselves with the belief that major cryptocurrencies could lose value but never hit absolute zero. The assumption was that the sheer size of their market capitalisation, the number of holders, and their integration within blockchain ecosystems offered a level of protection against complete collapse. However, the sudden liquidation of ATOM disproved this myth. On Binance, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges, ATOM’s value briefly collapsed to nothing.
This was not the result of the Cosmos blockchain itself disappearing or being abandoned. Instead, it was a result of how exchange trading systems, liquidation mechanisms, and liquidity provision interact under extreme market stress. The event exposed the reality that price is not always a reflection of underlying utility but of order book activity at a given moment in time. If the order book is drained and stop-losses cascade, even a multibillion-dollar coin can temporarily hit zero.
What actually happened during the liquidation event
At the heart of the collapse was Binance’s liquidation engine. Crypto exchanges often rely on automated liquidation systems to protect their platforms from insolvency when traders use leverage. When the market turned sharply against leveraged ATOM positions, forced selling overwhelmed the order book. Buy orders disappeared, liquidity evaporated, and the token’s price was driven down to the very bottom.
In a market driven by algorithms, once price levels breach certain thresholds, automatic triggers accelerate the collapse. In this case, ATOM plummeted to zero on the exchange before snapping back up as liquidity slowly returned. Traders who had orders placed at fractions of a cent suddenly found themselves making gains in the tens of thousands of percent when the price recovered to two dollars.
This was a moment of extreme redistribution. Some traders were entirely wiped out, losing their positions as liquidations cascaded. Others, often by chance, captured life-changing profits because they had standing orders at absurdly low levels.
Why ATOM matters in the wider crypto ecosystem
The Cosmos blockchain is not a small project. It is one of the leading interoperability platforms in the digital asset world, sometimes referred to as the “internet of blockchains”. It allows different blockchains to communicate with each other, a crucial function in the push toward Web3 and decentralised finance. Its token, ATOM, has consistently ranked among the top cryptocurrencies by market capitalisation, with billions in trading volume across exchanges.
For such a coin to hit zero, even briefly, is deeply significant. It undermines confidence in the supposed security of large-cap assets and highlights the systemic risks present in cryptocurrency exchanges. If ATOM, with its established ecosystem and widespread adoption, can collapse to nothing on a leading exchange, then other major assets such as Solana or even Ethereum could theoretically face similar vulnerabilities.
What it reveals about trading against unregulated players
The event raised uncomfortable questions about the nature of cryptocurrency markets. Unlike traditional financial systems, where exchanges are tightly regulated, crypto exchanges operate in a largely unregulated environment. They control order books, liquidation engines, and matching systems with little external oversight.
This means that traders are not simply speculating against other investors. They are trading against platforms with near-total control over the rules of engagement. Exchanges profit from fees, liquidations, and in some cases from proprietary trading desks that benefit from volatility. The accusation that traders are “trading against unregulated scammers” reflects the deep mistrust that exists between retail investors and the platforms that host their assets.
For retail traders, the risk is clear. Even when investing in legitimate projects with real-world utility, the structural vulnerabilities of exchanges can wipe out entire portfolios in seconds.
Historical parallels: when coins collapsed before
The Cosmos incident is not the first time a cryptocurrency has suffered an extreme collapse. History is filled with examples of coins and projects losing nearly all their value, sometimes permanently. The most infamous example is Terra (LUNA) in 2022, which collapsed from a US$40 billion market cap to virtually nothing within days after its algorithmic stablecoin, UST, de-pegged from the dollar. Investors were left with massive losses, and the collapse shook confidence in decentralised finance.
Similarly, flash crashes on exchanges have occurred multiple times in Bitcoin’s history. In 2010, Bitcoin famously fell from US$0.08 to US$0.01 on the Mt Gox exchange due to a trading exploit. More recently, Ethereum suffered sudden drops on exchanges like Kraken, where its price briefly fell to under US$100 during periods of high volatility.
What makes the ATOM case unique is the sheer scale of its ecosystem and the fact that it was not tied to a failing project or broken protocol. The collapse was purely an exchange-driven event, underscoring the fragility of liquidity even for leading coins.

Financial lessons for investors
The Cosmos crash offers several financial lessons for traders and long-term investors.
First, it emphasises the importance of risk management. Trading with high leverage might multiply profits in good times, but during liquidation events it can erase entire accounts instantly. Keeping positions unleveraged or minimally leveraged reduces exposure to catastrophic liquidation cascades.
Second, it highlights the role of liquidity. Assets are only worth what someone is willing to pay at a given moment. In moments of crisis, liquidity disappears, and even valuable coins can become untradeable. Investors should not assume that “blue-chip” cryptocurrencies are immune to liquidity shocks.
Third, it underscores the need for diversification. Placing an entire portfolio in one token, no matter how promising, exposes investors to systemic risks. A diversified portfolio across different assets, including those outside of crypto, provides protection when one sector experiences sudden collapse.
Finally, the event illustrates the advantage of keeping long-term holdings in cold storage rather than exposed on exchanges. Exchange-based trading carries risks not only of flash crashes but of hacks, insolvencies, and policy changes.
Could Ethereum or Solana really go to zero?
If Cosmos can go to zero on an exchange, then so too could Solana or Ethereum. While this may sound extreme, it is theoretically true. Exchange prices are determined by order book mechanics. If liquidity dries up and liquidation engines force massive sell-offs, the price can briefly crash to negligible levels.
However, there are mitigating factors. Ethereum and Solana have deeper liquidity, wider distribution across exchanges, and larger communities of institutional and retail investors. A total collapse to zero across the entire market would be unlikely.
What is more realistic is isolated incidents on individual exchanges, similar to what happened with ATOM. These moments may be brief but can still cause catastrophic financial consequences for those caught in leveraged positions.

The path forward: regulation and investor protection
The Cosmos event reignited the debate over regulation in the crypto industry. Critics argue that without external oversight, exchanges will continue to operate systems that expose retail investors to unnecessary risk. Proponents of regulation call for stricter rules on liquidation engines, transparency in order book activity, and better consumer protection.
On the other hand, crypto purists argue that regulation goes against the decentralised ethos of blockchain technology. They suggest that investors should accept volatility as part of the game and focus on decentralised exchanges and self-custody as alternatives to centralised platforms.
In reality, the industry may need a balance. As long as major coins are traded on centralised exchanges, events like the ATOM crash will remain possible. A regulatory framework that forces transparency without stifling innovation may be the best way to prevent similar collapses.
The lesson of ATOM’s fall
The moment Cosmos went to zero on Binance will be remembered as one of the most dramatic flash crashes in crypto history. It shattered the belief that major coins were immune to absolute collapse, exposed the vulnerabilities of unregulated exchanges, and served as a warning to traders and investors.
Whether one sees it as evidence of systemic manipulation or as a natural byproduct of unregulated markets, the financial lessons are clear. Investors must manage risk, diversify, and remain cautious when placing trust in centralised platforms. The story of ATOM’s collapse is not just about one coin; it is a reminder that in the crypto markets, nothing is guaranteed, and even giants can fall to nothing in seconds.
__________________

Every month in 2025 we will be giving away one Amazon eGift Card. To qualify subscribe to our newsletter.
When you buy something through our retail links, we may earn commission and the retailer may receive certain auditable data for accounting purposes.
Recent Articles
- The ultimate global Christmas food guide: 25 festive must-haves for a merry home
- Holiday ready: The checklist that brings joy back to the season
- Warren Buffett retires at 95: The oracle of Omaha hands the reins
- Jackery brings major savings on home backup and outdoor power
- National food self-sufficiency
You may also like:
Crypto crash: Inside the US$19 billion meltdown, Hyperliquid’s woes, and the human toll
The best times to convert Bitcoin to AUD: A seasonal analysis
Bitcoin just hit US$110,000: Don’t buy it, mine it instead and start earning in minutes!
Bitcoin treasury: Trump Media’s billion-dollar strategic move
Why now is the best time to buy Bitcoin
How to transfer money internationally with crypto
Unlocking the future of wealth: Gold-backed cryptocurrency revolution
Why Warren Buffett hates Bitcoin
Why Dan Peña “hates” Warren Buffett: Contrasting titans of wealth
Michael Burry: The visionary investor who predicts the market
Beginner’s guide to taking crypto profits in 2025
Raoul Pal predicts altcoin boom: Is 2024 the perfect time to invest?
Top 10 cryptocurrencies to buy right now!
Bitcoin price surge: Why this could be just the beginning
Can you trust Michael Saylor?
Michael Saylor: Bitcoin to hit US$13 million by 2045
Crypto loans: The impact of borrowing and lending crypto on the traditional banking industry
Top crypto research tools you should have
Gaming and cryptocurrency: How to explore this technological marvel
Crypto wallet security: Tips to keep your digital assets safe from hackers
Crypto exchange hacks and how to protect your assets
Crypto investing for retirement: Is it a viable option?
Mastercard Crypto Credential brings more trust to the blockchain ecosystem
Crypto Visa: Guarda Wallet introduces new prepaid Visa card
@sweettntmagazine
Discover more from Sweet TnT Magazine
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Sweet TnT Magazine Trinidad and Tobago Culture
You must be logged in to post a comment.