Why falling birth rates matter more than climate change, according to Elon Musk.

Why Elon Musk says population collapse is a bigger threat than global warming

Population collapse has moved from an abstract demographic concern to a central warning voiced by some of the world’s most influential thinkers. Elon Musk has repeatedly argued that falling birth rates pose a more serious long-term threat to civilisation than climate change. His reasoning is not rooted in ideology or nostalgia, but in arithmetic, technology, and social behaviour. At the heart of the issue lies a dramatic and accelerating breakdown in how people form relationships, build families, and sustain societies. Increasingly, the evidence suggests that the rise of the internet, smartphones, and social media has become a primary driver of this global demographic reversal.

Vitality – The Best Testosterone Supplement for Men

A clinically dosed blend featuring KSM-66® Ashwagandha, Shilajit, DIM, and Zinc to optimize testosterone levels, fertility, mood, and vitality.

Understanding population collapse in practical terms

Population collapse refers to a sustained fertility rate below replacement level, meaning fewer than 2.1 children per woman in developed countries. Once this threshold is crossed and maintained, populations age rapidly, workforces shrink, and the economic and social systems built on continuous growth begin to strain. Today, the United States, the United Kingdom, Japan, South Korea, much of Europe, and a growing list of middle-income and developing nations all sit well below replacement fertility.

Japan’s birth rate has fallen by roughly five percent year on year. England and the United States have hit historic lows. More striking is the fact that similar declines are occurring in places where traditional explanations do not fit. Turkey, Tunisia, Mexico, Guatemala, and parts of India are experiencing fertility collapse despite differing cultures, religions, income levels, and family norms. This universality is what alarms Musk and others. When a trend appears across societies with little in common, the cause is usually structural rather than cultural.

Why older explanations no longer hold

For decades, falling birth rates were explained by contraception, women’s education, and workforce participation. The introduction of the contraceptive pill in the 1960s clearly reshaped family planning in the United States and Europe, halving fertility rates over two decades. Yet that transition stabilised long ago. Today’s collapse is occurring in regions where access to contraception has not changed significantly and where female labour participation remains low.

Economic arguments also fail to fully explain the pattern. The cost of living matters, but fertility is falling fastest among poorer groups rather than wealthier ones. In some of the least expensive countries in which to raise children, birth rates continue to decline. Surveys consistently show that while financial pressure is a concern for parents, it rarely ranks as the primary reason for not having children.

Education gaps between men and women are similarly insufficient as a universal explanation. In parts of the Middle East and North Africa, male educational attainment still exceeds female attainment, yet fertility has collapsed. South Korea, with one of the largest gender pay gaps in the developed world, has one of the lowest fertility rates on Earth. The data does not support a simple narrative of empowered women opting out of motherhood.

Online therapy and virtual counseling available now

Improve your mental well-being with online therapy. Get access to our therapy program online from your smartphone or computer. Book a therapy appointment online today.

The collapse of coupling, not childbirth

Research by sociologist Alice Evans reframes the problem in a crucial way. The decline in fertility is not primarily driven by couples choosing to have fewer children. It is driven by fewer couples forming in the first place. Marriage rates and long-term cohabitation have fallen sharply across continents. If coupling rates in the United States had remained constant over the past decade, total fertility would be higher today despite economic pressures.

This pattern appears across East Asia, Latin America, Europe, and most severely in the Middle East and North Africa. People are pairing up later or not at all. The result is fewer children, regardless of personal attitudes toward family. Surveys show that many young adults still want children in theory. They simply never reach the social conditions required to have them.

The economic consequences Elon Musk worries about

Musk’s concern centres on the mechanical consequences of Population Collapse. Modern economies depend on a large working-age population supporting retirees through taxation, productivity, and care services. As birth rates fall and life expectancy rises, this ratio deteriorates rapidly.

In postwar Europe, there were roughly eight workers for every retiree. In Japan today, there are fewer than two. Projections show that by 2050, countries such as Italy could have fewer than one worker per person over the age of 65 if migration does not increase dramatically. No economy in history has sustained such dependency ratios without severe decline.

Economists Charles Goodhart and Manoj Pradhan argue that governments have failed to prepare for this demographic reversal. Healthcare systems, pension schemes, and social contracts were designed for expanding populations. As societies age, labour shortages emerge in precisely the sectors that cannot be automated or outsourced, such as elder care, healthcare, and personal services. Productivity gains alone cannot solve a problem rooted in human presence.

Why technology has changed social behaviour at scale

The most compelling explanation for the global nature of Population Collapse lies in the transformation of daily life through digital technology. Over the past fifteen years, smartphones and mobile internet access have altered how people meet, communicate, form identities, and spend their time. This shift occurred almost simultaneously across the world.

Research shows that geographical differences in declining coupling closely track mobile internet usage. Where smartphone adoption and social media penetration rise fastest, relationship formation declines most sharply. This is not coincidental. Digital platforms replace in-person interaction with algorithmically curated substitutes that demand attention without requiring commitment or vulnerability.

Young men and women increasingly consume different media, reinforcing ideological and cultural divides. Data from the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Poland, China, and South Korea shows a widening political gap between young men and young women under 30. In some countries, this divide opened within a single decade. When worldviews diverge this rapidly, forming stable relationships becomes more difficult.

Social media and the erosion of intimacy

Social media offers the illusion of connection while undermining the conditions needed for real intimacy. People spend hours interacting with screens rather than with each other. Even when physically together, attention is often divided. This constant partial engagement reduces emotional availability, patience, and empathy, all of which are essential for forming long-term bonds.

Dating apps, while marketed as tools for connection, often exacerbate the problem. They commodify relationships, encourage endless comparison, and reward novelty over stability. For many users, especially men at the lower end of perceived desirability, repeated rejection leads to withdrawal rather than persistence. For women, constant digital attention can raise perceived opportunity costs of commitment.

The result is a feedback loop. Fewer relationships form, fewer families emerge, and social isolation increases. This isolation, in turn, drives people deeper into digital spaces that promise comfort without risk.

Health, loneliness, and demographic decline

The consequences extend beyond birth rates. Studies in public health show that living with a partner and maintaining close social ties significantly improves longevity, rivaling the benefits of regular exercise. Conversely, social isolation correlates with higher rates of depression, anxiety, obesity, and chronic disease.

An emerging body of research links the rise of digital culture to what some scholars describe as an epidemic of despair. Mental health struggles are particularly acute among teenage girls, who report record levels of depression and self-harm ideation. These trends coincide closely with the rise of smartphone use and social media engagement.

From a demographic perspective, poor mental health further reduces the likelihood of partnership and parenthood. People struggling to regulate their emotions or self-worth are less likely to take on the long-term responsibility of raising children.

Why incentives alone cannot fix population collapse

In response, some governments have attempted to pay citizens to have children. China, Russia, Hungary, and others offer tax breaks, cash bonuses, and housing incentives. While these policies may slightly increase births among those already inclined to have families, they do little to address the underlying problem. Financial incentives cannot create relationships where none exist.

Evidence suggests that women who begin having children earlier tend to have more over their lifetimes. Yet in a world where fewer young people are forming partnerships at all, encouraging early childbirth becomes irrelevant. The demographic crisis begins long before the decision to conceive.

Online Counseling: Try Talk Therapy from Home | hims

Why Elon Musk sees this as an existential risk

Musk’s warning about population collapse is not alarmist rhetoric. It reflects a systems-level understanding of civilisation. Without enough people, innovation slows, institutions weaken, and cultural continuity fractures. Technology cannot replace the social fabric required to sustain human societies.

Climate change poses serious challenges, but it operates within a living, adaptable population. Population collapse removes the agents needed to respond to any crisis at all. A shrinking, ageing society becomes risk-averse, inward-looking, and politically unstable. History shows that such societies struggle to recover once decline sets in.

Rebuilding a world worth forming families in

The implication is not that technology must be rejected, but that its role in human life must be rebalanced. Encouraging real-world interaction, shared experiences, and community engagement is no longer a cultural preference but a demographic necessity. Societies that succeed in restoring social trust and intimacy will stabilise. Those that do not will continue to shrink.

Population collapse is not caused by people losing the desire for children. It is caused by a world that has quietly made forming human bonds more difficult. Until that reality is confronted, no amount of policy adjustment or financial incentive will reverse the trend Elon Musk warns about.

__________________