How big tech’s "safety" measures are a new form of internet censorship, quietly killing online privacy for data and profit.

Internet censorship 2025: How big tech’s ‘safety’ measures are quietly killing online privacy

The internet has always been a place of openness, anonymity, and decentralised freedom. That ethos is rapidly eroding. In recent years, and especially in 2025, a disturbing pattern has emerged: private technology giants such as YouTube and TikTok are voluntarily adopting draconian surveillance and identification requirements often without any legal obligation to do so.

Under the guise of “online safety” and “protecting children”, these platforms are forcing users to surrender sensitive personal data such as government-issued IDs, credit card details, and even facial recognition scans simply to access their services.

This creeping form of internet censorship has nothing to do with protecting minors and everything to do with expanding data collection, deepening user tracking, and serving more personalised advertising. It is not just a regulatory issue it is a structural shift in how the internet operates, with enormous implications for privacy, freedom of expression, and the future of online anonymity.

The ‘child safety’ Trojan Horse

As covered in Sweet TnT Magazine’s previous analysis, The EU’s chat message surveillance push: How to protect your privacy before October 2025, the European Union’s controversial Chat Control policy uses child protection as a justification for mass scanning of private messages. While this measure is framed as a safeguard for vulnerable users, it opens the door for intrusive surveillance of everyone, regardless of whether they are suspected of wrongdoing.

This is the same model now being voluntarily adopted by major platforms like YouTube and TikTok in markets where no such law exists. In the United States, for example, there is no federal mandate requiring users to upload identification documents to watch videos or post content.

Yet these companies have begun demanding them anyway. Their reasoning? Vague “safety” concerns and the fear of being accused of failing to protect minors. In practice, these policies give corporations an excuse to harvest even more personal information, from birth dates to biometric data.

YouTube’s AI age scanning and the end of anonymity

The most glaring example of this shift is YouTube’s newly launched AI-driven age verification system. Rolled out in 2025, the system uses machine learning to analyse viewing habits and predict a user’s age, regardless of the birth date they provided when signing up. If the AI determines that a user may be under 18, it will automatically restrict content access and prompt for additional proof of age.

This “proof” requires either a government-issued ID, a valid credit card, or a live selfie linking a user’s real-world identity to their Google account in a permanent and verifiable way. The company claims this protects young audiences, but in reality it creates a massive new database of user identities tied to behavioural data, watch history, and location tracking. For advertisers, this is gold. For users, it is a dangerous erosion of anonymity.

Even more concerning is YouTube’s simultaneous war on virtual private networks (VPNs). VPNs are a key tool for maintaining privacy and bypassing region-based censorship, but YouTube has long been throttling traffic and blocking accounts it suspects of using them to bypass restrictions. With the AI age verification system in place, VPN use becomes an obstacle to the platform’s new data-driven business model and that means more aggressive anti-VPN enforcement is almost certain.

TikTok’s parallel push for ID collection

YouTube is not alone. TikTok is also introducing its own AI-driven age verification systems in the United States, again without any legal requirement to do so. Users suspected of being underage are flagged and told to upload government-issued identification, a credit card, and a selfie. Even long-standing accounts can be locked until the verification process is completed.

While the policy is sold as a safety feature, it creates a centralised repository of sensitive data for a platform already facing scrutiny over its handling of user information. With every ID upload, TikTok gains the ability to more precisely target content, ads, and recommendations not only for children but for all users, forever linking their offline identities to their online behaviour.

Wikipedia and the legal precedent problem

This trend is not limited to social media platforms. Wikipedia recently lost a legal challenge to the UK’s Online Safety Act, which means it could now be required to verify the identity of its volunteer editors. Although Wikipedia’s lawyers argued that this threatens human rights and the safety of contributors, the judgement against them sets a dangerous precedent: even non-profit, community-driven platforms can be forced into identity-collection regimes.

The message is clear if a platform as open and collaborative as Wikipedia can be pressured into ID verification, every other site will eventually follow suit. And for the major tech corporations, which are already driven by advertising revenue, such measures are a business opportunity, not a compliance burden.

The real motive: Advertising, not safety

If these companies truly cared about free speech, privacy, and user rights, they would take the approach of alternative platforms like Rumble, which has blocked access in countries with excessive censorship demands rather than comply with intrusive laws. Instead, YouTube, TikTok, and others are rushing to implement ID verification globally.

The reason is simple: the more they know about you your name, age, location, spending habits, and even your facial features the better they can target advertisements. Having a government ID and credit card on file allows for frictionless purchasing, opening the door to microtransactions, paid features, and personalised shopping integrations directly within the platform. The rhetoric of safety is a smokescreen for the monetisation of identity.

Why VPNs are in the crosshairs

Virtual private networks have long been the enemy of platforms that profit from tracking user behaviour. By masking IP addresses and encrypting internet traffic, VPNs prevent advertisers from building accurate profiles. For YouTube and similar platforms, this anonymity undermines the effectiveness of their ad-targeting algorithms.

The war on VPNs is not about stopping illegal activity; it is about preserving the quality of the behavioural data pipeline. In 2025, YouTube has stepped up this battle, limiting certain features, blocking premium subscriptions purchased via VPNs, and using AI detection methods to flag VPN traffic. This aligns perfectly with their broader goal: to ensure every view, click, and purchase can be traced back to a verified, monetisable identity.

One VPN. Limitless possibilities.

Experience true freedom online. Gain unrestricted access to global content, block annoying ads, and safeguard your privacy with a fast and secure VPN.

The death of anonymous browsing

One of the founding principles of the internet was the ability to engage with information without being forced to reveal your offline identity. This is what allowed whistleblowers, activists, and vulnerable individuals to share ideas without fear of reprisal. With compulsory ID verification becoming the norm, that anonymity is vanishing.

The chilling effect on free speech will be profound. Users will self-censor, knowing that their names, photos, and legal documents are permanently tied to everything they say or watch online. This will make the internet safer for advertisers and authoritarian governments—but far more dangerous for ordinary citizens.

Global policy creep

The most alarming aspect of this trend is how quickly it spreads beyond its point of origin. A policy introduced in the UK or EU can be implemented worldwide by multinational corporations without any democratic process or public debate in other jurisdictions. In the US, where no such law exists, platforms are voluntarily adopting the EU’s Chat Control-style policies simply because it aligns with their business interests.

This form of policy creep bypasses national laws and treats corporate terms of service as global governance. Users have no voting power, no legal recourse, and no alternative if they want to participate in mainstream online life.

Why use a VPN

SECURITY: Our secure VPN sends your internet traffic through an encrypted VPN tunnel, so your passwords and confidential data stay safe, even over public or untrusted Internet connections.

PRIVACY: Keep your browsing history private. As a Swiss VPN provider, we do not log user activity or share data with third parties. Our anonymous VPN service enables Internet without surveillance.

FREEDOM: We created ProtonVPN to protect the journalists and activists who use ProtonMail. ProtonVPN breaks down the barriers of Internet censorship, allowing you to access any website or content.

Get ProtonVPN Now

How to protect your privacy now

In its earlier article on the EU’s chat message surveillance, Sweet TnT Magazine outlined strategies for safeguarding your privacy, including using privacy-focused messaging apps, regularly clearing cookies and trackers, and maintaining separate email addresses for different online activities. In the face of growing ID verification demands, these strategies need to be expanded:

Use reputable VPNs while they still work, and be prepared to rotate providers if your current one is blocked.
Adopt privacy-first platforms for video, messaging, and browsing whenever possible.
Minimise your data footprint by avoiding optional uploads, disabling personalised ads, and refusing unnecessary verification requests.
Support digital rights organisations like the Electronic Frontier Foundation, which campaign against mass surveillance and ID mandates.
Keep offline backups of important content, as censorship and access restrictions can occur suddenly.

The road ahead

Internet censorship is no longer limited to government firewalls and overt content bans. It now operates through corporate policy changes that reshape the very structure of online participation. By framing these changes as child safety measures, tech giants have found a politically unassailable way to demand unprecedented access to our most personal data.

What is at stake is not simply whether you can watch a particular video or access a certain app it is whether the internet remains a space where people can think, speak, and explore without being tracked like a consumer in a shopping mall.

The battle over internet censorship in 2025 is not one we can afford to ignore. Once anonymity is gone, it will not return. And once our IDs are permanently linked to our online identities, every click, search, and comment will be part of a profile designed to sell us more and show us less.

The creeping encroachment of surveillance by platforms like YouTube and TikTok is a warning: if we do not defend the open internet now, it will be reduced to a fully commercialised, tightly monitored, ad-driven network one where privacy is a luxury only available to those willing to disconnect entirely.

___________________