Property tax map: The 10 US states where homeowners pay the most and least.

The 2026 property tax map: Which US states and cities are becoming most expensive for homeowners

The 2026 property tax map shows that New Jersey, Illinois, Connecticut, Vermont and New Hampshire have the highest effective property tax rates, while Hawaii, Alabama, Arizona, Utah and South Carolina remain among the least expensive. Property taxes are a long-term housing expense that can materially change the financial attractiveness of a home even when the purchase price appears affordable.

The latest nationwide data show substantial differences between states, counties and metropolitan areas, with Illinois and New Jersey standing out for particularly high effective rates and Texas carrying a significant local property-tax burden despite having no state property tax. California occupies a different position because Proposition 13 limits the basic ad valorem property tax rate and constrains reassessment, producing a comparatively low effective statewide rate despite high home prices.

This 2026 Property Tax Map examines the five most expensive states, the five least expensive states, places with no general state-level property tax, and the cities and metropolitan areas where local taxation can substantially alter the cost of homeownership. For buyers considering New Jersey, Texas, Illinois, California or another state, the central lesson is that the mortgage is only part of the long-term housing equation.

Key Takeaways

New Jersey and Illinois have the highest effective owner-occupied property tax rates.
Hawaii has the lowest effective property tax rate among the 50 states.
Texas has no state property tax, but local property taxes are comparatively high.
California’s Proposition 13 produces a relatively low effective property tax rate.
Property taxes can make an inexpensive home substantially costlier over decades.

Why the 2026 property tax map is an important consideration

Buying a home is often framed around the purchase price, mortgage interest rate, insurance premium and maintenance costs. Property tax deserves equal attention because it continues for as long as the property is owned, including after the mortgage has been completely repaid. A buyer who saves US$100,000 on the purchase price but moves into a jurisdiction with substantially higher annual property taxes can discover that part of the apparent saving disappears over time.

The scale of the difference is considerable. The Tax Foundation’s latest state comparison, based on US Census Bureau data, places New Jersey and Illinois at an effective property tax rate of 1.88% of owner-occupied housing value. Hawaii is at 0.29%. That means the effective rate in the highest-tax states can be more than six times the rate in the lowest-tax state.

The distinction between an advertised property tax rate and an effective property tax rate is important. Local governments can calculate taxes against assessed values using different assessment ratios, exemptions, caps and valuation systems. The effective rate attempts to standardise the comparison by measuring actual property taxes against the property’s market value.

The 2026 Property Tax Map therefore should not be interpreted as a simple map of statutory tax rates. It is better understood as a comparison of the amount homeowners actually pay relative to the value of their homes.

There is another important timing issue. The most comprehensive nationwide datasets available in 2026 do not necessarily represent tax bills issued during the 2026 calendar year. The Tax Foundation’s state comparison uses 2024 owner-occupied housing data, while ATTOM’s latest annual analysis covers property taxes levied on single-family homes during 2025. These datasets are currently among the most useful benchmarks for understanding the 2026 housing market.

The five most expensive property tax states in 2026

At the top of the Property Tax Map are New Jersey and Illinois, followed by Connecticut, Vermont and New Hampshire when measured by effective property tax rates on owner-occupied housing.

New Jersey and Illinois each recorded an effective rate of 1.88% in the Tax Foundation’s latest state comparison. Connecticut followed at 1.54%, Vermont at 1.51% and New Hampshire at 1.50%. Nebraska was next at 1.44%, while Texas registered 1.40%.

The difference becomes easier to understand through a hypothetical US$400,000 home. A 1.88% effective rate would equate to approximately US$7,520 a year before accounting for local exemptions or individual assessment circumstances. At 0.50%, the corresponding figure would be approximately US$2,000. Over 30 years, ignoring changes in property value and tax rates, the difference would amount to more than US$165,000.

Actual bills can be substantially different because assessments, exemptions, local levies and property values vary. Nevertheless, the calculation demonstrates why property taxes should be treated as a recurring ownership cost rather than a minor addition to the mortgage.

ATTOM’s more recent 2025 data provide a complementary picture. Illinois recorded the highest statewide effective rate in its analysis at 1.84%, followed by New Jersey at 1.58%, Vermont at 1.40%, Connecticut at 1.36% and Ohio at 1.32%. New Hampshire followed at 1.29%.

The two datasets use different methodologies, which explains why their rankings and rates are not identical. The underlying conclusion is consistent: the Northeast and Midwest contain many of America’s highest property-tax jurisdictions.

Pet insurance with super fast everything

New Jersey: America’s property tax problem

New Jersey deserves particular attention because it combines high property values with exceptionally high property taxes. The state ranked first in the Tax Foundation’s latest owner-occupied effective-rate comparison at 1.88%.

ATTOM’s 2025 analysis found that New Jersey produced an average single-family property tax bill of US$10,499, the highest statewide average in the country. Connecticut followed at US$8,901, New Hampshire at US$8,174, Massachusetts at US$7,904 and New York at US$7,732.

This creates an important distinction between tax rate and tax bill. A state can have a relatively moderate effective rate but still produce large tax bills when houses are expensive. New Jersey combines both factors, making it especially important for buyers comparing communities across state lines.

For someone considering New Jersey against Pennsylvania, Delaware or another nearby state, the headline purchase price should therefore be accompanied by a projection of property taxes over the intended ownership period. A US$600,000 home with a high annual tax burden can ultimately cost much more than a similarly priced property in a lower-tax jurisdiction.

Illinois: High taxes at the local level

Illinois is another critical market on the 2026 Property Tax Map. Its 1.88% effective rate in the Tax Foundation’s latest owner-occupied comparison places it alongside New Jersey at the top. The state also derives a substantial share of its state and local tax revenue from property taxation.

Illinois demonstrates why buyers should investigate the taxing jurisdiction rather than stopping at the state level. Property taxes can differ dramatically between counties, municipalities and school districts.

ATTOM’s 2025 data illustrate the issue particularly clearly. Several Illinois counties recorded effective rates above 2%, including Rock Island County at 2.22%, Will County at 2.14%, Macon County at 2.12%, McLean County at 2.12% and Kendall County at 3.58%.

The metropolitan picture is equally significant. Among metropolitan areas with populations of at least one million, Chicago recorded an effective property tax rate of 1.78% in ATTOM’s 2025 analysis, second only to Rochester, New York, among the largest metros measured.

For Illinois buyers, this means that moving only a few miles can potentially change the long-term tax economics of a purchase. School districts, municipal boundaries and county assessments can all affect the final bill.

Car insurance that costs less for safe drivers

Super fast everything. Seamless claims. Low rates for low mileage.

Texas: No state property tax does not mean low property taxes

Texas is one of the most misunderstood states on the Property Tax Map. Texas has no state property tax, but local governments impose and collect property taxes. Counties, school districts, cities and special-purpose districts can all participate in the system.

This distinction matters enormously for someone moving to Texas because of its absence of a state individual income tax.

The Tax Foundation places Texas at a 1.40% effective property tax rate on owner-occupied housing, substantially above California’s 0.70% and far above Hawaii’s 0.29%.

Texas consequently demonstrates why comparing one tax in isolation can produce a misleading picture of housing affordability. A homeowner may save on state income taxes while paying considerably more in local property taxes.

The state’s system also gives homeowners specific opportunities to reduce taxable value through exemptions. The Texas Comptroller explains that qualifying homeowners can receive exemptions from appraised value, including mandatory and locally adopted exemptions.

For prospective buyers, the relevant calculation is therefore not simply “Texas has no property tax”. The meaningful question is how much property tax the specific county, school district, municipality and special-purpose districts will impose on the particular house.

California: Why expensive homes can have lower property taxes

California presents the opposite situation. The state is famous for extremely expensive housing, yet its effective property tax rate is comparatively low.

The Tax Foundation places California at 0.70% of owner-occupied housing value, ranking it 32nd among the states in its latest comparison.

The principal historical reason is Proposition 13, approved by California voters in 1978. Article XIII A of the California Constitution limits the basic ad valorem tax on real property to 1% of full cash value, subject to additional voter-approved charges and assessments.

Proposition 13 also fundamentally changed the relationship between property ownership and taxation by tying the assessed value of property largely to its acquisition value and limiting annual increases in assessed value, subject to specific rules and exceptions.

That creates an unusual situation in which two neighbouring homeowners with similarly valuable houses can have very different property tax bills because they purchased their homes at different times.

For a prospective buyer, however, California’s relatively low effective rate does not make housing inexpensive. A 0.70% rate applied to a US$1 million property represents approximately US$7,000 a year before considering local assessments and exemptions. A cheaper US$400,000 house in a jurisdiction with a 1.50% effective rate could generate approximately US$6,000 in annual property taxes.

The correct comparison is therefore always property value multiplied by the realistic effective tax burden.

Renters insurance that keeps your stuff safe

Renter tested. Landlord approved. Starting from $5/mo.

The five cheapest property tax states

The lower end of the 2026 Property Tax Map looks very different. Hawaii has the lowest effective rate among the 50 states at 0.29%, followed by Alabama at 0.37%, Arizona at 0.48%, Utah at 0.48% and South Carolina at 0.49% in the Tax Foundation’s latest owner-occupied housing data.

ATTOM’s more recent 2025 methodology produces a slightly different ordering. Hawaii recorded a 0.33% effective rate, followed by Idaho at 0.39%, Wyoming at 0.40%, Arizona and Alabama at 0.43%, and Utah at 0.45%.

These differences demonstrate why consumers should not treat a single national ranking as an absolute answer. Different datasets measure different property populations and use different methodologies.

Hawaii is particularly interesting because low property taxes coexist with some of America’s highest housing costs. A low tax rate therefore does not automatically make a state affordable.

Alabama provides a stronger example of low property taxation combined with relatively modest housing costs. Its effective rate is among the lowest nationally, and ATTOM recorded an average 2025 single-family property tax bill of US$1,284.

Are there states with no property tax?

There is an important misconception surrounding the phrase “states with no property tax”. No US state completely eliminates ordinary property taxation on real estate statewide for all homeowners.

Some states do not impose a state-level property tax because taxation is administered primarily by counties, municipalities, school districts and other local governments. Texas is the clearest example. The Texas Comptroller explicitly states that Texas has no state property tax, while local taxing units collect property taxes.

This distinction means that a property-tax map showing “no state property tax” should never be interpreted as “homeowners pay no property tax”.

For homebuyers, the practical measure is the annual tax bill attached to the individual property. A state with no state-level property tax can still have a high effective local property tax burden.

America’s most loved homeowners insurance

Zero hassle. Great prices. Trusted by your lender.

The cities and counties where property taxes become serious

Property taxation becomes even more important when the analysis moves from states to metropolitan areas and counties.

ATTOM’s 2025 metropolitan analysis found the highest effective rates among metros with populations above 200,000 in Binghamton, New York, at 2.27%, followed by Champaign, Illinois, at 1.95%, Trenton, New Jersey, at 1.89%, Peoria, Illinois, at 1.88%, and Rockford, Illinois, at 1.86%.

Among metropolitan areas with populations exceeding one million, Rochester, New York, led at 1.82%, followed by Chicago at 1.78%, Buffalo at 1.73%, Cleveland at 1.63% and Philadelphia at 1.41%.

The lower end included Knoxville and Salisbury at 0.29%, Honolulu at 0.33%, Johnson City at 0.34% and Lake Havasu City at 0.34% among the qualifying metropolitan areas.

The county data reveal even larger disparities. ATTOM identified Schuylkill County, Pennsylvania, with a 4.59% effective rate and Kendall County, Illinois, at 3.58% among larger counties meeting its population and housing criteria.

This is why a genuinely useful Property Tax Map must eventually move below the state level. A state average can conceal substantial differences between neighbouring counties and municipalities.

The long-term cost of choosing the wrong tax jurisdiction

Property tax becomes particularly important when the ownership horizon stretches to 10, 20 or 30 years.

Consider two US$400,000 homes. If one carries an effective annual property tax burden of 0.50% and the other 1.50%, the difference begins at US$4,000 per year. Without accounting for property appreciation, inflation or tax-rate changes, the cumulative difference reaches US$40,000 after ten years and US$120,000 after 30 years.

Real-world results can be considerably larger because property values and local government budgets change. ATTOM reported that the national average property tax bill on a single-family home increased 3% in 2025 to US$4,427, while the national effective rate rose from 0.86% to 0.90%.

This makes property tax an especially important consideration for retirees, families buying their long-term home and anyone intending to remain in one location for decades.

The most financially rational home search therefore starts with total cost of ownership rather than asking price alone.

Term life insurance for the next generation

The most coverage for your family, at the lowest possible price.

The 2026 property tax map changes how buyers should shop

The strongest conclusion from the 2026 Property Tax Map is that buyers should compare housing markets using a combination of purchase price, effective property tax rate, actual historical tax bills, reassessment rules, exemptions, insurance and expected long-term appreciation.

New Jersey and Illinois deserve particular scrutiny because their high effective rates can materially increase the cost of ownership. Texas deserves scrutiny for the opposite reason: its lack of a state property tax can create the impression of low taxation even though local property taxes are high. California requires a different analysis because Proposition 13 creates a relatively low effective rate but high property values and unusual differences between newer and older owners.

Meanwhile, states such as Hawaii, Alabama, Arizona, Utah and South Carolina demonstrate that lower property taxation can significantly alter the economics of homeownership, although a low tax rate does not automatically mean low overall living costs.

For anyone comparing homes across the United States in 2026, the property tax bill should be treated as part of the purchase price spread across the entire ownership period. A home that costs US$50,000 less today but carries US$3,000 more in annual property taxes could ultimately be the more expensive purchase.

The most useful Property Tax Map is therefore not simply a map showing where taxes are highest and lowest. It is a financial decision-making tool that reveals how taxation interacts with home prices, local government, schools, assessments and time. In a housing market where buyers are increasingly shopping across state lines, understanding that relationship can be as important as finding the right house.