Electronics and drugs targeted: Breaking down the latest US tariff update.

Tariff update: Latest US tariff changes on Chinese imports and national security measures

As global supply chains continue to be reshaped by geopolitical tensions, the United States has made significant announcements regarding its tariff policy—particularly focussed on Chinese imports. From revised electronic tariffs to new national security investigations, these updates underscore Washington’s growing commitment to economic decoupling from China. This article provides a concise, historically grounded overview of the latest tariff update, clarifying key developments that took place between April 12th and 14th, 2025.

Clarification on tariffs for Chinese electronics

One of the most talked-about updates came on April 12th, when US President Donald Trump clarified ongoing confusion surrounding tariffs on Chinese-made electronics. Speaking in response to speculation from Chinese state media and misleading interpretations of a previous announcement, Trump firmly denied that iPhones or other electronic products manufactured in China had been granted any form of tariff exemption.

Contrary to earlier claims, these products were not removed from tariff coverage but rather shifted from a “125% reciprocal tariff category” into a new classification. This re-categorisation does not imply any reduction in duty; in fact, these electronics remain subject to a 20% tariff, which the Trump administration attributes to China’s alleged role in the fentanyl crisis. This move effectively separates economic tariffs from those tied directly to national health and security concerns, while still maintaining significant cost barriers to Chinese tech imports.

US Commerce Department launches national security investigations

On April 14th, the US Department of Commerce escalated its economic stance by launching formal investigations into the national security implications of several key import sectors. The probe covers two strategic industries:

Semiconductors and related manufacturing equipment
Pharmaceutical ingredients and finished drugs

This action is widely interpreted by trade analysts as a precursor to new tariffs on these sectors. Drawing parallels with the 2018 steel and aluminium tariffs—justified under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act for national security—analysts suggest the US may soon declare these supply chains critical, thus warranting similar protective measures.

Trump’s push for tariff-driven repatriation of supply chains

US President Trump reinforced this policy direction with a statement issued on Truth Social on April 13th, announcing plans to initiate a broader “national security tariff investigation” targeting the entire electronics supply chain. This includes not just finished goods like smartphones and laptops but also the upstream manufacturing processes that support their production.

Trump highlighted the strategic necessity of reclaiming manufacturing capacity, stating that “America must never be held hostage by countries like China”. His rhetoric signals a renewed emphasis on domestic production, a theme that has gained bipartisan traction in recent years due to vulnerabilities exposed by the COVID-19 pandemic and ongoing geopolitical rivalries.

Commerce Secretary hints at imminent new tariffs

In tandem with Trump’s statement, US Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnik provided further clarity on the administration’s future intentions. Speaking on April 13th, Lutnik confirmed that the government is preparing to impose “special focus tariffs” on a wide array of electronic goods, including:

Smartphones
Computers
Other consumer electronics

These tariffs are expected to materialise within the next one to two months. In addition, Lutnik disclosed plans for “industry-wide tariffs” on both the semiconductor and pharmaceutical sectors. These measures aim to reduce dependency on foreign supply chains while bolstering national resilience.

National security framing and historical context

The underlying rationale for these proposed and current tariff actions centres around national security concerns. This marks a continuation of the policy precedent set during Trump’s first term, when 25% tariffs on steel and aluminium were imposed in 2018. These tariffs were not simply economic tools but were cast as essential for preserving America’s defence industrial base.

Today, a similar argument is being advanced with regard to technology and healthcare. The logic is that control over semiconductors and critical medicines is as vital to national survival as steel once was to military capability. As such, the administration aims to bring production of these goods back to US soil by making imports less economically viable through aggressive tariff strategies.

Outlook and global implications

This latest tariff update signals a decisive phase in the US-China trade conflict, transitioning from punitive trade measures to a broader economic realignment rooted in national security. If implemented, the new wave of tariffs will likely escalate tensions between the two superpowers and could provoke retaliatory actions from Beijing.

Already, Chinese authorities have imposed their own 125% retaliatory tariffs, according to sources cited in the transcript. While the accuracy of these figures is contested, the broader trend is unmistakable: global trade is becoming increasingly fragmented along strategic lines.

Preparing for the next trade shock

For importers, manufacturers, and investors, these developments underscore the urgency of monitoring tariff policy in real time. The days of static globalisation are over, replaced by a dynamic geopolitical chessboard where tariffs serve as instruments of strategic leverage.

As of mid-April 2025, businesses should anticipate:

Increased costs for electronic goods made in China.
Potential new duties on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals.
Delays and disruptions in supply chains tied to future investigations.

Whether you’re a policy analyst, business owner, or consumer, staying abreast of each tariff update is critical. As the United States sharpens its economic posture against China, these changes will have far-reaching effects not just on trade, but on the global economy at large.

________________________