How big tech’s "safety" measures are a new form of internet censorship, quietly killing online privacy for data and profit.

Internet censorship 2025: How big tech’s ‘safety’ measures are quietly killing online privacy

The internet has always been a place of openness, anonymity, and decentralised freedom. That ethos is rapidly eroding. In recent years, and especially in 2025, a disturbing pattern has emerged: private technology giants such as YouTube and TikTok are voluntarily adopting draconian surveillance and identification requirements often without any legal obligation to do so.

Under the guise of “online safety” and “protecting children”, these platforms are forcing users to surrender sensitive personal data such as government-issued IDs, credit card details, and even facial recognition scans simply to access their services.

This creeping form of internet censorship has nothing to do with protecting minors and everything to do with expanding data collection, deepening user tracking, and serving more personalised advertising. It is not just a regulatory issue it is a structural shift in how the internet operates, with enormous implications for privacy, freedom of expression, and the future of online anonymity.

The ‘child safety’ Trojan Horse

As covered in Sweet TnT Magazine’s previous analysis, The EU’s chat message surveillance push: How to protect your privacy before October 2025, the European Union’s controversial Chat Control policy uses child protection as a justification for mass scanning of private messages. While this measure is framed as a safeguard for vulnerable users, it opens the door for intrusive surveillance of everyone, regardless of whether they are suspected of wrongdoing.

This is the same model now being voluntarily adopted by major platforms like YouTube and TikTok in markets where no such law exists. In the United States, for example, there is no federal mandate requiring users to upload identification documents to watch videos or post content.

Yet these companies have begun demanding them anyway. Their reasoning? Vague “safety” concerns and the fear of being accused of failing to protect minors. In practice, these policies give corporations an excuse to harvest even more personal information, from birth dates to biometric data.

YouTube’s AI age scanning and the end of anonymity

The most glaring example of this shift is YouTube’s newly launched AI-driven age verification system. Rolled out in 2025, the system uses machine learning to analyse viewing habits and predict a user’s age, regardless of the birth date they provided when signing up. If the AI determines that a user may be under 18, it will automatically restrict content access and prompt for additional proof of age.

This “proof” requires either a government-issued ID, a valid credit card, or a live selfie linking a user’s real-world identity to their Google account in a permanent and verifiable way. The company claims this protects young audiences, but in reality it creates a massive new database of user identities tied to behavioural data, watch history, and location tracking. For advertisers, this is gold. For users, it is a dangerous erosion of anonymity.

Even more concerning is YouTube’s simultaneous war on virtual private networks (VPNs). VPNs are a key tool for maintaining privacy and bypassing region-based censorship, but YouTube has long been throttling traffic and blocking accounts it suspects of using them to bypass restrictions. With the AI age verification system in place, VPN use becomes an obstacle to the platform’s new data-driven business model and that means more aggressive anti-VPN enforcement is almost certain.

TikTok’s parallel push for ID collection

YouTube is not alone. TikTok is also introducing its own AI-driven age verification systems in the United States, again without any legal requirement to do so. Users suspected of being underage are flagged and told to upload government-issued identification, a credit card, and a selfie. Even long-standing accounts can be locked until the verification process is completed.

While the policy is sold as a safety feature, it creates a centralised repository of sensitive data for a platform already facing scrutiny over its handling of user information. With every ID upload, TikTok gains the ability to more precisely target content, ads, and recommendations not only for children but for all users, forever linking their offline identities to their online behaviour.

Wikipedia and the legal precedent problem

This trend is not limited to social media platforms. Wikipedia recently lost a legal challenge to the UK’s Online Safety Act, which means it could now be required to verify the identity of its volunteer editors. Although Wikipedia’s lawyers argued that this threatens human rights and the safety of contributors, the judgement against them sets a dangerous precedent: even non-profit, community-driven platforms can be forced into identity-collection regimes.

The message is clear if a platform as open and collaborative as Wikipedia can be pressured into ID verification, every other site will eventually follow suit. And for the major tech corporations, which are already driven by advertising revenue, such measures are a business opportunity, not a compliance burden.