How remittance providers turn small transfers into big business.

How remittance platforms really make money and what that means for users

Remittances have become one of the most vital financial arteries in the global economy. Migrant workers and expatriates send money back home to support families, contribute to local economies, and fuel development. According to the World Bank, remittance flows to low- and middle-income countries reached hundreds of billions of US dollars annually, dwarfing official development assistance in many regions.

Understanding how remittance platforms really make money is essential for users who want to keep more of their hard-earned funds in the pockets of their loved ones. This article examines the historical evolution of remittances, the business models that underpin remittance providers, the cost structures imposed on users, and the implications for senders and recipients in an increasingly digital world.

Send & Receive Money

We transfer world-wide

Send money online to 200 countries and territories with hundreds of thousands of Western Union agent locations.

The historical roots of remittances

Remittances trace their origin to the earliest forms of labour migration. Long before formal banking systems existed, workers carried earnings home or entrusted funds to travelling merchants. By the early 20th century, postal and telegraphic money orders became formalised ways of sending money across borders. Migrant communities developed informal networks where couriers physically transported cash on behalf of senders. These systems relied on trust and community bonds, and fees were negotiated locally.

With globalisation and mass migration in the latter half of the 20th century, formal remittance corridors expanded. Western Union, established in the 19th century, and other legacy operators built international agent networks that allowed users to send money to distant regions with relative reliability. Banks entered the market, but often offered poor exchange rates and high fees, making dedicated remittance companies the default choice for many senders.

Why remittance platforms charge fees

Remittance platforms make money in three primary ways: direct fees, exchange rate margins, and financial asset management. Each revenue stream has direct consequences for users in terms of cost, speed, and transparency.

Direct fees are straightforward charges imposed for the service of moving money. These fees vary by provider, destination, payment method, and speed of delivery. For example, sending money with priority delivery might cost more than a standard transfer. Historically, these fees were openly stated at the point of transaction. Users often compared fees among providers to find the most affordable option.

Exchange rate margins are less transparent than direct fees. When a remittance is sent, the sender’s currency must be converted into the recipient’s local currency. Remittance platforms often mark up the exchange rate above the mid-market rate (the rate banks use when trading currencies among themselves). This mark-up represents a hidden cost to users. For many providers, the spread between buy and sell rates constitutes a significant portion of their profit. Users often focus on the headline transfer fee but overlook the amount lost through unfavourable rates.

Financial asset management is an emerging revenue source. Remittance platforms hold large volumes of customer funds, sometimes for short periods during the transfer process and, in other models, in stored-value accounts or e-wallets. These balances can generate interest income or be deployed in short-term financial markets. In some jurisdictions, regulations require platforms to hold customer funds in safeguarded accounts that earn little to no interest for the firm. In others, firms can optimise these funds to generate profit.

Send money online from the United States at our best price

Join millions of customers around the world and start sending and receiving money with Western Union.

The digital revolution and new business models

The arrival of digital remittance platforms has transformed the industry. Companies such as Wise (formerly TransferWise), Remitly, WorldRemit and others introduced online and app-based transfers that cut out physical agent networks. These digital models reduce overhead, increase transparency, and often lower costs for users. By operating primarily through digital infrastructure and local payment rails, these platforms charge lower direct fees and present exchange rates with smaller margins.

Blockchain and cryptocurrency technologies have also entered the remittance space. Platforms leveraging blockchain aim to settle transfers more quickly and with lower cost by eliminating intermediaries. Users can send digital assets that are converted to local currency on the recipient’s end. While this model can reduce the friction of international transfers, it introduces volatility risk and regulatory complexity. Users must understand that crypto-based remittances may incur conversion fees, network fees, and price fluctuations.

Another business model involves peer-to-peer (P2P) remittances. In this model, a sender’s transfer is matched with an equivalent payment in the recipient’s country, often through a network of users or partners. This minimises actual cross-border currency movement, reducing costs. Platforms that employ P2P methods may charge subscription fees or take small margins on currency exchange.

Breakdown of revenue streams

To understand what users pay for, it helps to unpack the major components of remittance revenue:

Direct transaction fees: These are the upfront charges communicated to the sender at the time of transfer. They compensate the provider for operational costs, compliance with anti-money laundering and know-your-customer regulations, customer service, and payment processing.

Foreign exchange margins: The difference between the rate offered to users and the mid-market rate. Exchange rate mark-ups vary widely among providers. Even when a platform advertises low fees, unfavourable exchange rates can erode savings.

Intermediary bank fees: When transfers route through correspondent banks, these institutions may charge handling fees, especially in traditional bank-to-bank transfers. Digital platforms often avoid these costs by partnering with local banks or payment processors.

Settlement costs: Some routes may require physical cash delivery or use of regional settlement systems. Operational expenses for maintaining these networks are built into pricing.

Value-added services: Some providers offer bill payments, mobile top-ups, or cash pickup at partner locations. These services generate additional revenue streams that subsidise core transfer costs.

Interest or float income: Funds held in transit or in customer accounts can generate earnings. Regulatory frameworks in many countries limit what can be done with customer funds, but in others, platforms leverage these balances as profitable assets.

How costs differ by corridor

The cost of remittances depends heavily on the countries involved. Established corridors such as the United States to Mexico or Europe to Africa have substantial competition, which tends to lower fees and tighten exchange rate spreads. Developing corridors with less competition or weaker financial infrastructure often carry higher costs. According to the World Bank’s Remittance Price Database, average global costs were above 6 percent of the transfer value in recent years, with significant variation. High costs disproportionately impact low-income recipients who rely on consistent remittances for basic needs.

Regulation and compliance costs

Remittance platforms operate in a highly regulated environment. Anti-money laundering (AML), counter-terrorism financing (CTF), and know-your-customer (KYC) requirements impose significant compliance costs. Providers must verify sender and recipient identities, monitor transactions for suspicious activity, and report to authorities. These obligations protect users and financial systems but add to operational expenses, which are reflected in pricing. Larger firms can absorb compliance costs across volume, while smaller platforms may charge higher fees to cover these expenses.

Regulation also affects transparency. In some jurisdictions, regulators require clear disclosure of fees and exchange rates. In others, oversight is less stringent, allowing providers to present opaque pricing that conceals costs within exchange rate margins. Users should seek platforms that provide full transparency, with clear break-downs of fees and exchange rates.

What it means for users

For individual senders, the implications of how remittance platforms make money are profound. The cost of remittances directly affects disposable income in recipient households. High fees reduce the effective value delivered. Sending money frequently amplifies these costs over time. Users need to compare both direct fees and exchange rate margins when selecting a provider. A low advertised transfer fee may be offset by poor exchange rates.

Speed and delivery method also matter. Faster transfers often cost more. Cash pickup services in remote locations may incur additional charges. Digital wallets and bank deposits usually cost less but require recipients to have access to banking or mobile money services.

Users should be aware of hidden costs. Some platforms charge fees for receiving funds, particularly if the recipient must collect cash at an agent location. Additionally, intermediary fees from correspondent banks can apply without clear notice to the sender or recipient.

Strategies to minimise costs

To keep remittance costs low, users can adopt several strategies. Planning transfers in advance reduces reliance on expedited services. Comparing providers at the time of transfer, rather than relying on historical preferences, allows users to capture better pricing. Selecting corridors with digital delivery options can eliminate cash pickup fees. Utilising platforms with transparent pricing and competitive exchange rates ensures more value reaches recipients.

For frequent senders, some providers offer loyalty programmes or reduced fees for high-volume users. Understanding fee structures, including monthly caps or tiered pricing, can yield savings. Users should also verify whether recipients incur any charges upon receipt.

Send money online from the United States with Remitly

Send money online faster and more securely with Remitly, and discover our great exchange rates and low money transfer fees.

The future of remittances

The remittance landscape continues to evolve. Globalisation, digital payment innovation, and regulatory changes shape how money moves across borders. Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) may offer new settlement mechanisms, reducing costs further. Cross-border payment standards like SWIFT gpi aim to enhance transparency and speed, forcing legacy players to improve offerings.

Blockchain technologies propose near-instant settlement with minimal fees, though widespread adoption depends on regulatory clarity and user trust. Partnerships between fintech firms and local financial institutions can expand access in underserved regions, lowering costs through scale and efficiency.

As competition intensifies, user expectations rise. Platforms that prioritise transparency, fair pricing, and reliable delivery are likely to attract and retain senders. Users who educate themselves on fee structures and market options will benefit from lower costs and better outcomes.

Conclusion

Remittance platforms make money through a combination of direct fees, exchange rate margins, intermediary charges, and financial asset management. Each revenue stream affects the cost to users and the value delivered to recipients.

Historical models have evolved into digital ecosystems that prioritise speed, transparency and lower costs, but challenges remain. Users must be vigilant, comparing providers and understanding fee structures to maximise the funds that reach their families and communities. With informed choices and emerging innovations, remittances will continue to serve as a lifeline for millions worldwide, and the path to lower-cost, transparent services is increasingly attainable.

__________________