Kevin O’Leary, Elon Musk, and the TikTok ban case: What’s next for the platform?

TikTok ban case: The history, legal battle, and future outlook

TikTok, one of the most popular social media platforms in the world, has been under intense scrutiny in the United States for its ties to China through its parent company, ByteDance. Over recent years, escalating concerns about data privacy and national security have led to legal and political challenges aimed at curbing TikTok’s influence. This article delves into the history of the TikTok ban case, the ongoing court battles, the potential sale of the platform, and its uncertain future.

The road to the TikTok ban case

TikTok’s troubles in the United States began during the Trump administration, which first raised alarms about the app’s data collection practices. It was alleged that TikTok harvested user data and transmitted it to China, posing a national security threat. ByteDance, TikTok’s parent company, repeatedly denied these accusations, but evidence of data mismanagement fuelled scepticism.

The situation escalated in 2020 when an executive order was issued to force ByteDance to divest TikTok’s US operations to an American company. However, legal challenges delayed the enforcement of this order, keeping TikTok operational in the interim.

The Biden administration inherited these concerns and reignited efforts to address potential risks. In late 2024, the Supreme Court began reviewing whether the app constituted a significant threat to national security, with the ban set to take effect on January 19, 2025. The ruling required TikTok to be sold to a US-based company to avoid a shutdown.

Kevin O’Leary and Elon Musk enter the scene

Amid the uncertainty, prominent entrepreneurs like Kevin O’Leary from “Shark Tank” and tech mogul Elon Musk expressed interest in acquiring TikTok. O’Leary reportedly explored options to secure investor backing and debt financing to make an offer. While Musk’s speculative interest garnered headlines, neither party secured an agreement with ByteDance.

However, experts highlight that any sale would not be straightforward. ByteDance’s proprietary algorithm and intellectual property are central to TikTok’s success, and it remains unclear whether ByteDance is willing to relinquish these assets to a foreign entity.

Current legal battle

TikTok’s legal team has faced an uphill battle in court. The platform has argued that banning the app infringes on First Amendment rights, framing TikTok as a medium for free speech. However, Supreme Court justices across ideological lines expressed doubts about this defense. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Elena Kagan questioned whether the First Amendment was applicable, given that the law targets a foreign corporation without constitutional rights.

The arguments have also revolved around whether TikTok’s data practices truly endanger national security. Government lawyers have contended that TikTok’s immense user data—spanning 170 million Americans—offers a tool for espionage, recruitment, and potential harassment. This view aligns with broader concerns about China’s alleged efforts to build detailed profiles of US citizens through digital platforms.

The best online VPN service for speed and security | NordVPN

TikTok’s possible futures

The platform faces several potential outcomes as the January 19 deadline approaches:

1. Sale to an American entity

If TikTok is sold to a US-based company, it could ensure the platform’s continuity in the American market while addressing national security concerns. However, this process involves several complexities. ByteDance would need to agree to terms that allow the US company to access and control TikTok’s infrastructure without compromising the proprietary technology at the heart of its success—its highly advanced recommendation algorithm.

This algorithm is what sets TikTok apart, creating highly engaging content feeds by analysing user behaviour in real-time. For ByteDance, sharing this technology risks weakening its competitive edge in other markets. Moreover, US lawmakers and regulators would need to oversee and approve any deal to ensure it satisfies security and data-handling concerns.

Potential buyers like Kevin O’Leary or Elon Musk might require substantial financial backing to complete such a transaction, involving billions of dollars. Even if a deal were reached, the transition to American ownership might disrupt TikTok’s operations temporarily, affecting its creators and advertisers. Additionally, it would raise questions about whether American companies could manage the platform with the same level of efficiency and innovation as ByteDance.

Why use a VPN

SECURITY: Our secure VPN sends your internet traffic through an encrypted VPN tunnel, so your passwords and confidential data stay safe, even over public or untrusted Internet connections.

PRIVACY: Keep your browsing history private. As a Swiss VPN provider, we do not log user activity or share data with third parties. Our anonymous VPN service enables Internet without surveillance.

FREEDOM: We created ProtonVPN to protect the journalists and activists who use ProtonMail. ProtonVPN breaks down the barriers of Internet censorship, allowing you to access any website or content.

Get ProtonVPN Now

2. Complete ban

If TikTok is unable to secure a sale or intervention from the courts, it could face a full ban in the United States. This would mean the app would no longer be available for download on major app stores like Apple’s App Store or Google Play, nor would it be accessible through traditional internet connections within the country. Such a scenario would mark the first time a platform of this scale was effectively banned in the US due to national security concerns.

While tech-savvy users might circumvent the ban using virtual private networks (VPNs) to access TikTok from foreign servers, this approach is not foolproof. VPN usage could be targeted with additional restrictions, making access more cumbersome. Moreover, without official support in the US, TikTok influencers and businesses that rely heavily on the platform for income and brand promotion would face significant setbacks.

For creators, a ban would mean losing a critical tool for audience engagement, potentially forcing them to shift to competing platforms like Instagram Reels or YouTube Shorts. Similarly, businesses that have invested in TikTok advertising campaigns might see their reach and effectiveness dwindle overnight, disrupting marketing strategies and leading to financial losses.

The best VPN service for speed and security

Avoid cyberthreats with NordVPN. Avoid malware-infected downloads, malicious websites, and trackers with NordVPN’s Threat Protection Pro. Get up to 75% off NordVPN’s 2-year plan + 4 months extra.

3. Legal extensions

ByteDance has a history of using legal challenges to delay adverse outcomes, and this strategy could be employed once again to push the TikTok ban further into the future. By filing appeals and exploring additional legal options, ByteDance could extend the timeline, buying itself more time to negotiate a deal or find alternative solutions.

The legal battles might focus on constitutional questions, such as whether banning TikTok violates the First Amendment by limiting access to a platform that enables free speech. While the Supreme Court has shown scepticism toward these arguments, ByteDance could appeal to public opinion by highlighting the platform’s role in providing a voice for millions of creators, small businesses, and activists.

Prolonged litigation would also give TikTok more time to adjust its operations to comply with US regulations or develop a contingency plan to retain its presence in the market. However, ongoing legal uncertainty could deter advertisers, investors, and creators, reducing the platform’s overall value and user engagement during the process.

4. Adaptation by ByteDance

In the event of a ban or an insurmountable legal challenge, ByteDance might shift its strategy to retain its global dominance in the social media market. This could involve redirecting its focus to sister apps or developing entirely new platforms tailored to specific regional markets. ByteDance’s promotional efforts on TikTok for its lesser-known sister apps suggest that this contingency plan is already underway.

One possibility is the launch of a rebranded version of TikTok designed to comply with US regulations. This approach would allow ByteDance to distance the app from its Chinese origins while retaining its user base and key features. Another strategy might involve expanding the reach of existing platforms or introducing new products to fill the void left by TikTok in the US.

Globally, ByteDance might double down on markets outside of the US, particularly in Europe, Asia, and Latin America, where TikTok continues to grow. It could also explore partnerships with non-American companies to maintain its competitive edge and adapt to shifting geopolitical landscapes.

While these adaptations could mitigate the impact of a ban, they may not fully address the loss of TikTok’s vast and lucrative US user base, which plays a pivotal role in ByteDance’s global strategy and financial success.

Broader implications

The TikTok saga underscores the growing tensions between the United States and China over technology and data sovereignty. While the ban aims to curb potential risks, critics argue that it does little to address broader issues of data privacy. Other platforms, including Facebook and Instagram, also collect extensive user data, which is often sold to third parties.

Furthermore, TikTok’s potential ban raises questions about the precedent it sets for government intervention in private businesses. As debates continue, the outcome of this high-profile case could shape the future of digital platforms in the US and beyond.

Conclusion

The fate of TikTok hangs in the balance as the January 19 deadline looms. With court decisions, potential sales, and geopolitical considerations at play, the platform’s future remains uncertain. Whether through a sale, ban, or legal maneuvering, the TikTok case highlights the intersection of technology, national security, and global commerce. As users await the final verdict, the implications of this landmark decision will likely reverberate across the tech industry for years to come.

_____________________