July 7 alert: Google Gemini will read your messages unless you stop it.

WARNING: Google Gemini will take over your Phone on July 7 – here’s how to stop it

Google Gemini July 7 privacy nightmare: What you need to know

On July 7, 2025, Google will implement a major update to its Gemini AI assistant that will affect nearly every Android user on the planet. Dubbed the “no-opt out” feature, this change will grant Gemini unprecedented access to your phone’s most sensitive apps including Messages, Phone, WhatsApp, and essential utilities like timers and the flashlight.

Even if you’ve disabled Gemini’s app activity tracking in the past, this new policy overrides your preferences by default. In short, Google is about to give its AI assistant full control of your smartphone, whether you want it or not.

A default takeover: What is happening on July 7

Google’s quiet rollout of this policy change has caught many off guard. If you use Android, your device will be enrolled automatically in the new system, where Gemini gains the ability to perform tasks like sending texts, making calls, and interacting with third-party apps on your behalf.

While Google claims this access is meant to enhance functionality and user convenience, the reality is far more troubling. The move comes with minimal transparency and creates a significant loophole in user privacy protections.

Users who think they disabled Gemini activity tracking by switching off “App Activity” will be shocked to discover that Gemini will still have access. The only way to truly revoke access is to dig deep into the Gemini app’s settings and manually disable permissions for each application. This intentional obfuscation is a major red flag for anyone concerned about digital autonomy and data security.

Your calls and messages are no longer yours

What does this mean in practise? Starting July 7, Gemini will have the ability to read your text messages, initiate phone calls, and interact with personal apps like WhatsApp and Messenger.

This includes access to private messages, voice call logs, and potentially even sensitive content from third-party services. Despite Google assuring users that these interactions are not stored long-term if App Activity is disabled, all exchanges will still be temporarily retained for up to 72 hours for “safety and reliability”.

Even if those intentions are sincere, this opens the door to a range of risks, including unauthorised access, misinterpretation of commands, and accidental sharing of personal or confidential information. With Gemini now acting as the intermediary for communication on your phone, it becomes a gatekeeper of your private life without you ever signing up for that role.

Big tech overreach: This is not just a feature update

This is not simply a product update or a smarter assistant. This is yet another step in Big Tech’s persistent campaign to blur the line between service provider and digital overlord. Google has effectively decided that your phone should now serve Gemini first, and you second. And instead of giving you a clear and visible choice, they’ve made consent something you must hunt down across multiple menus.

Historically, the erosion of user control has always been dressed in convenience. Facebook did it with location tracking and facial recognition. Apple did it with forced cloud syncs. And now, Google is doing it with AI-powered total device access. It’s a classic bait-and-switch strategy: offer you a helpful assistant, then use it as a backdoor into every corner of your digital life.

How this can go wrong: Real risks, real consequences

Even if you trust Google today, the implications of this kind of access are far-reaching. Imagine the following scenarios:

A Gemini bug triggers an unintended call to someone in your contacts during a private conversation.
A phishing app or malware exploits Gemini’s access to send text messages to your bank or read 2FA codes.
An abusive partner or employer uses voice commands to trigger Gemini remotely and monitor your phone’s activities.
A rogue employee at Google accesses logs that were supposed to be temporary.

Each of these outcomes is entirely plausible because the architecture now assumes that Gemini can act on your behalf. Once permissions are granted, revoking them is deliberately difficult. This level of exposure is not acceptable under any standard of user consent or digital security.